Teaching, Learning, and Research Hub
Generic filters

Content Types







Categories






















Content Types
Select all
Articles
Blog Post
Collection
Presentations
Resource Lists
Videos

Academic-Research Careers

General grantsmanship tips regarding formatting, writing to the reviewers and review criteria, and preparing initial sections (part 1 of 3) The following is a summary of the video transcript: Planning and Preparation: Formatting and Structure: Collaboration: Key Sections: Writing Tips: Review Process: Specific Aims Page: The presentation emphasizes the importance...

The following is a summary of the video transcript: 1. Purpose and Importance: 2. Components of the Plan: 3. Prioritization and Time Management: 4. Research Planning: 5. Project Management: 6. Tools and Techniques: 7. Writing and Collaboration: 8. Professional Development: 9. Flexibility and Adaptation: The presentation emphasizes the importance of...

The following is a summary of the video transcript: 1. Introduction to Grant Writing: 2. Preparation and Planning: 3. Key Components of a Grant Application: 4. Review Criteria: 5. Specific Aims: 6. Writing Tips: 7. Budget Considerations: 8. Human Subjects and Clinical Trials: 9. Resources and References: The presentation emphasizes...

The following is a summary of the video transcript: 1. Purpose of grant review: 2. NIH framework used due to its prominence in funding health-related research 3. Review process steps: 4. Peer review focuses on: 5. Key review criteria: 6. Written critique guidelines: 7. Oral review guidelines: 8. Scoring: 9....

The following is a summary of the video transcript: 1. Preparing for review panel discussions: 2. Review panel protocol: 3. Reviewer roles: 4. Effective reviewer behaviors: 5. Problematic reviewer behaviors: 6. Handling conflicts of interest: 7. Multidisciplinary considerations: 8. Addressing bias: 9. Impact of reviews: 10. Key advice: The presentation...

The following is a summary of the video transcript: 1. Sources of reviewer bias: 2. Racial disparities in funding rates: 3. Intersectionality: 4. Implicit bias: 5. Anti-racist reviewing: 6. Strategies to minimize bias: 7. Importance of anti-racist reviewing: The presentation emphasizes the need for reviewers to be aware of their...

Well-known is the shortage of PhD academic-researchers in audiology, speech-language pathology, and speech and hearing science. The severity of this issue was officially recognized by ASHA and the Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders (CAPCSD) in a 2002 report: Crisis in the Discipline: A Plan for Reshaping...

There is no doubt that the foundational information in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) gained during undergraduate studies sets the stage for success during graduate education and beyond. We recognize that a clinician who is steeped in the science of the discipline will make wise and informed decisions that serve...

Over the past several years, the ASHA Journals program has grown and developed quite a bit. This growth is in keeping with the rapidly changing scholarly publishing environment and in support of ASHA’s strategic goals to improve knowledge translation between research and practice. As part of this evolution, the ASHA...

Scholarly publishing is about 350 years old, dating back to 1665 with the publication of the propitiously titled Philosophical transactions: Giving some accompt [account] of the present understandings, studies, and labours of the ingenious in many considerable parts of the world(Ware & Mabe, 2015). The scholarly journals of the American...

Related Categories